<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ( f o o b a r . l u )</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foobar.lu/wp/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foobar.lu/wp</link>
	<description>coding should be fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:40:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on OverkillFlickr: a Flickr API interface for PHP5 by doc.twn</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>doc.twn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>the class is now available on github

http://github.com/wickeddoc/OverkillFlickr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the class is now available on github</p>
<p><a href="http://github.com/wickeddoc/OverkillFlickr" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/wickeddoc/OverkillFlickr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adding Scrollbars to a QFrame in Qt by Maxim</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/09/10/adding-scrollbars-to-a-qframe-in-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/09/10/adding-scrollbars-to-a-qframe-in-qt/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>But how i can add scroller to stackedWidget ? I tried several variants can you help me ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how i can add scroller to stackedWidget ? I tried several variants can you help me ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OverkillFlickr: a Flickr API interface for PHP5 by abernier</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>abernier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Hi doc.twn,

Your class is really the smartest I&#039;ve found!

I&#039;ve enhanced/cleaned it a bit: what about creating a github repo to host and share it? Then I can commit my changes.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi doc.twn,</p>
<p>Your class is really the smartest I&#8217;ve found!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enhanced/cleaned it a bit: what about creating a github repo to host and share it? Then I can commit my changes.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OverkillFlickr: a Flickr API interface for PHP5 by doc.twn</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>doc.twn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/#comment-602</guid>
		<description>ups, i forgot to remove that line.

initially i created this class to be used in a rather large project, and that project had a class called Kernel. you can ignore that.

EDIT: removed line</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ups, i forgot to remove that line.</p>
<p>initially i created this class to be used in a rather large project, and that project had a class called Kernel. you can ignore that.</p>
<p>EDIT: removed line</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OverkillFlickr: a Flickr API interface for PHP5 by abernier</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>abernier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2007/07/09/overkillflickr-a-flickr-api-interface-for-php5/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Hi,

What is this Kernel class in the constructor?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>What is this Kernel class in the constructor?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Studio forgetting about your ZF Project by doc.twn</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2009/06/16/zend-studio-forgetting-about-your-zf-project/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>doc.twn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/?p=56#comment-585</guid>
		<description>i wasn&#039;t even aware that there was a zend studio 7, thanks for the hint

downloading right now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wasn&#8217;t even aware that there was a zend studio 7, thanks for the hint</p>
<p>downloading right now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Studio forgetting about your ZF Project by Roy Ganor</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2009/06/16/zend-studio-forgetting-about-your-zf-project/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Ganor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/?p=56#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Have you tried already Zend Studio 7.0? it fixes some annoying issues from previous releases...


http://www.zend.com/en/products/studio/studio-7-early-access</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Have you tried already Zend Studio 7.0? it fixes some annoying issues from previous releases&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zend.com/en/products/studio/studio-7-early-access" rel="nofollow">http://www.zend.com/en/products/studio/studio-7-early-access</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worst practice, an example by exhuma.twn</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2009/04/23/worst-practice-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>exhuma.twn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/?p=51#comment-561</guid>
		<description>I bet whoever is responsible for this sits around in a nice, fancy looking suit with a black tie and shiny sunglasses.

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet whoever is responsible for this sits around in a nice, fancy looking suit with a black tie and shiny sunglasses.</p>
<p> <img src='http://foobar.lu/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best &#8220;How to run your internet  company&#8221; video EVER! by exhuma.twn</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2008/10/24/best-how-to-run-your-internet-company-video-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>exhuma.twn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2008/10/24/best-how-to-run-your-internet-company-video-ever/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Note in advance: when I say &quot;spec&quot;, I&#039;m talking about a list of functional requirements for the project!


He&#039;s talking about a large project (which may take longer) being split in several small projects where each only spans over a few weeks. But even then, even for a one-man project, a formal spec about *what* you plan to do is useful.

I agree that it&#039;s absolutely nuts to write down a 20 page document which takes you a whole week to write down only to end up with a notepad clone with a scrollbar on both sides.

But having an idea written down (even on a small post-it note) helps me to keep focussed on what&#039;s essential. When all you want to do is a notepad clone, it&#039;s silly to implement buttons to make text bold/italic and so on. These would not be &quot;functionally&quot; required. But along the line of coding I often have the thought: &quot;Would it not be nice/cool/great to.........&quot;. This though is distracting and if not careful you end up implementing something that&#039;s not necessary (not immediately anyway). In addition, getting side-tracked risks other part of the project being &quot;left behind&quot; or forgotten. Having a clear goal in front of your eyes helps you to get back on track. At least that&#039;s the case for me. I get easily distracted by cool and shiny new things.

What is more, having a goal specified helps me to see the Big Picture a lot better. This in turn helps to make design decisions along the lines.

On the bottom line, getting distracted is clearly my personal flaw. Having a formal spec helps me to stay on the right track. And I&#039;m certain that there are others having the exact same problem. For people like us, formal specs are a damn cool thing! ;)

On the top of my head I could go on stating the abundance of advantages you can have from *well written* (!!!) specs. But on the other side, if the spec is written by someone without the necessary domain knowledge and/or insights in the development process you&#039;re in for a real treat, and I hope for everyone&#039;s sake that they will never have cross high bridges when working in such a situation. Because you would most certainly want to see how it would look like to see the bridge moving away from you at fast speeds while watching it from below ;)

The problem is, it&#039;s not always easy to recognize a poorly written spec (although often it is). If it&#039;s poorly written, throw it out of the window as soon as possible!

Anyway..... I&#039;m rambling on again, and I lost my train of thought as I was just interrupted here in the office.... :/

I&#039;m sure this is a brilliant topic for some heated discussions, and it certainly is good fun to find valid arguments for and against specs.

Damn.... where&#039;s that bloody train of thought gone....??? I&#039;ll just stop babbling here and now! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note in advance: when I say &#8220;spec&#8221;, I&#8217;m talking about a list of functional requirements for the project!</p>
<p>He&#8217;s talking about a large project (which may take longer) being split in several small projects where each only spans over a few weeks. But even then, even for a one-man project, a formal spec about *what* you plan to do is useful.</p>
<p>I agree that it&#8217;s absolutely nuts to write down a 20 page document which takes you a whole week to write down only to end up with a notepad clone with a scrollbar on both sides.</p>
<p>But having an idea written down (even on a small post-it note) helps me to keep focussed on what&#8217;s essential. When all you want to do is a notepad clone, it&#8217;s silly to implement buttons to make text bold/italic and so on. These would not be &#8220;functionally&#8221; required. But along the line of coding I often have the thought: &#8220;Would it not be nice/cool/great to&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;. This though is distracting and if not careful you end up implementing something that&#8217;s not necessary (not immediately anyway). In addition, getting side-tracked risks other part of the project being &#8220;left behind&#8221; or forgotten. Having a clear goal in front of your eyes helps you to get back on track. At least that&#8217;s the case for me. I get easily distracted by cool and shiny new things.</p>
<p>What is more, having a goal specified helps me to see the Big Picture a lot better. This in turn helps to make design decisions along the lines.</p>
<p>On the bottom line, getting distracted is clearly my personal flaw. Having a formal spec helps me to stay on the right track. And I&#8217;m certain that there are others having the exact same problem. For people like us, formal specs are a damn cool thing! <img src='http://foobar.lu/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the top of my head I could go on stating the abundance of advantages you can have from *well written* (!!!) specs. But on the other side, if the spec is written by someone without the necessary domain knowledge and/or insights in the development process you&#8217;re in for a real treat, and I hope for everyone&#8217;s sake that they will never have cross high bridges when working in such a situation. Because you would most certainly want to see how it would look like to see the bridge moving away from you at fast speeds while watching it from below <img src='http://foobar.lu/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The problem is, it&#8217;s not always easy to recognize a poorly written spec (although often it is). If it&#8217;s poorly written, throw it out of the window as soon as possible!</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;.. I&#8217;m rambling on again, and I lost my train of thought as I was just interrupted here in the office&#8230;. :/</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this is a brilliant topic for some heated discussions, and it certainly is good fun to find valid arguments for and against specs.</p>
<p>Damn&#8230;. where&#8217;s that bloody train of thought gone&#8230;.??? I&#8217;ll just stop babbling here and now! <img src='http://foobar.lu/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best &#8220;How to run your internet  company&#8221; video EVER! by doc.twn</title>
		<link>http://foobar.lu/wp/2008/10/24/best-how-to-run-your-internet-company-video-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>doc.twn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foobar.lu/wp/2008/10/24/best-how-to-run-your-internet-company-video-ever/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>attention!

he&#039;s talking about a small company with 10 employees and projects which never take more than a few weeks.

in most cases, for projects like that you don&#039;t need specs. i agree maybe if you have a large projects with about 12-20 people involved and the project&#039;s about to stretch over 6 or 12 months. but for 6-week projects with a 6 headed developer team you don&#039;t need specs. but that&#039;s just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>attention!</p>
<p>he&#8217;s talking about a small company with 10 employees and projects which never take more than a few weeks.</p>
<p>in most cases, for projects like that you don&#8217;t need specs. i agree maybe if you have a large projects with about 12-20 people involved and the project&#8217;s about to stretch over 6 or 12 months. but for 6-week projects with a 6 headed developer team you don&#8217;t need specs. but that&#8217;s just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
